End-stage renal disease due to lupus nephritis Almost 10-30 % of ptns with proliferative LN ( lupus nephritis ) progress...
End-stage
renal disease due to lupus nephritis
Almost 10-30
% of ptns with proliferative LN (lupus nephritis) progress to ESRD.
Global prognosis has been greatly improved in recent era, owing to the advent of combined immunosuppression (im/m.).
The development of ESRD is usually, but
not always, accompanied with gradual complete or partial
resolution
of the extrarenal criteria of
lupus, despite the absence of an underlying known mechanism. Ptn survival with
either HDX or CAPD seems
to be simulating that in the general population of ptns with ESRD,
despite there’s higher risk of mortality during the 1st 3 mo of DX
due to sepsis
and other sequelae of high-dose im/m therapy.
There’s higher risk of peritonitis
& non-catheter-related
infection among PD ptns.
RTx is an accepted therapeutic
option for ptns with LN that’s accompanied
with better survival. Global 5- &
10-y graft survival rates are simulating that
among ptns with LN compared with rates among ptns with other causes.
LN ptns should be screened for
the presence of APA before proceeding
to KTx as KTx
recipients with underlying LN + APA may
be at a higher risk for thrombotic events.
LN is observed to recur in the Tx kidney in 2-11 % of LN ptns.
Ptns with clinically significant recurrence
requiring an alteration of therapy generally present with:
1) Higher
SCr above its baseline,
2) New-onset
proteinuria, &
3) New-onset
hematuria.
Episodes of recurrence are mostly seen in the 1st 10 ys. Recurrent
LN is usually milder than the original
disease observed in the native kidney and
promotes a good prognosis. The
incidence of graft
loss due to recurrent LN is < 2-4 %.
Dgx of recurrent LN
can be suspected among ptns recently developing proteinuria,
hematuria, or a higher SCr.
Dgx can be established by biopsy. Before proceeding to an allograft
biopsy, among all TR (transplant recipients) presenting with a high SCr,
we should keep:
1) Adequate hydration,
2) Optimize serum CNI levels, &
3) Perform
abdominal
US.
Moreover, among TR
who showed a PH of LN, we perform a kidney biopsy in
the setting of abnormal urinary protein
excretion or hematuria.
Therapy of recurrent lupus
nephritis rely primarily on the clinical
presentation & the histology findings. Among all ptns who have recurrent LN
& proteinuria >300 mg/d, > add either ACEi
or ARB, as much tolerated with monitoring of
S.K+, Cr, and the fall in BP. Certain ptns may need dose modification of
the im/m. protocol. Ptns showing a histologic Dgx of recurrent LN & a rapid
decline in eGFR or with proteinuria >500 mg/d or those showing
severe proliferative lesions on biopsy, they should be ttt with im/m. agents
targeted to manage LN. Options for im/m.
modification may include one of the following agents:
1) Higher
dose of MMF
to 2-3 g/d. or
2) Cph (cyclophosphamide)
& hold current antimetabolite (MMF or azathioprine). This can be done by the older National Institutes of Health (NIH) monthly protocol or by the newer Euro-Lupus protocol.
3) There’re
insufficient data in regard to rituximab therapy in ptns with allograft recurrence who
were failing both MMF & Cph
therapy.
4) Ptns
treated with a higher dose MMF or with adding Cph
should also be ttt with Steroids. Methylprednisolone
7 mg/kg or 500 mg IV/D./3 d. followed by a tapered oral steroid regimen.
COMMENTS